People v. SPYKSTRA
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey
I. Introduction
At issue in this original proceeding is a trial court ruling denying the District Attorney's motion to quash two subpoenas duces tecum served by Malinda Spykstra, the defendant in a pending child sexual assault case, on the parents of B.G., the victim. In denying the motion to quash, the trial court ordered the parents to permit a defense expert to search their home computer and retrieve emails written by B.G.
As a preliminary matter, we uphold the trial court's finding that the District Attorney has standing to challenge the subpoenas issued to the parents. On the merits,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Garrigan v. BowenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- State of Iowa v. Andrew Lee RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Zapata v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- People ex rel. E.G.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- People ex rel. E.G.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.