Legal Opinion

People v. SPYKSTRA

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 21, 2010No. 09SA91PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

I. Introduction

At issue in this original proceeding is a trial court ruling denying the District Attorney's motion to quash two subpoenas duces tecum served by Malinda Spykstra, the defendant in a pending child sexual assault case, on the parents of B.G., the victim. In denying the motion to quash, the trial court ordered the parents to permit a defense expert to search their home computer and retrieve emails written by B.G.

As a preliminary matter, we uphold the trial court's finding that the District Attorney has standing to challenge the subpoenas issued to the parents. On the merits,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Garrigan v. BowenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. State of Iowa v. Andrew Lee RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Zapata v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  4. People ex rel. E.G.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  5. People ex rel. E.G.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API