Legal Opinion
Marvine v. . Hymers
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 1855PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] There is no force in the objection that the Delaware Bank had not a right to transfer the note in question to the plaintiff. It was negotiable in its terms and according to the general rules of law; and the bank had the same right, which any other holder would have had, to transfer it to another by endorsement, or by delivery under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Planters' Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Utica Insurance v. BloodgoodNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- New York Firemen Insurance v. SturgesNew York Supreme Court · 1824
- President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. OsgoodNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Bank of Utica v. PhillipsNew York Supreme Court · 1829
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. DottenheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Band Realty Co. v. North Brewster, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Schofield v. State Nat. Bank of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- United States Nat. Bank v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- U. T. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co. v. BrighamNew York Supreme Court · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.