Legal Opinion

Schofield v. State Nat. Bank of Denver

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1899No. 1,157PublishedCited by 19 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The writ of error in this case challenges a judgment which sustained a general demurrer to a complaint made by the plaintiff in error, John W. Schofield, as receiver of the Union National Bank of Denver, Colo., against the State National Bank of that city. Each of these hanks was organized and was doing business under the national hanking law in June, 1894, in the city of Denver. The complaint disclosed these facts:

On June 23, 1894, negotiations were pending between the two banks for an assumption by the Union Bank of the indebtedness of the State Bank in .consideration…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Planters' Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  3. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. West St. Louis Savings Bank v. Shawnee County BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. The Bank of Genesee v. . the Patchin BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1855

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Housekeeper Pub. Co. v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  3. Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Manhattan Life Ins. v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. City Nat. Bank of Huron, SD v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API