Legal Opinion

Howard v. Ladner

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided October 16, 1953No. Civ. 1974PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs seek an injunction restraining the Secretary of State for the State of Mississippi from the enforcement and execution of a State statute, or a part thereof, upon the ground that, as construed and applied by the Supreme Court of Mississippi in Hoskins v. Howard, 214 Miss. 481, 59 So.2d 263, said statute, or part thereof, violates the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 1 The statute in question is now known as Chapter 458, Mississippi Laws of 1950, or as Sections 3107-01 to 3107-09 inclusive of the…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gart v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Olson v. Board of Ed. of U. Free Sch. Dist. No. 12, Malverne, NYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
  3. Bricker v. Sceva Speare Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1972
  4. Tuscarora Nation of Indians v. Power Authority of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1958
  5. Exxon Corp. v. BD. OF ED. OF LAMAR COUNTY, MISS.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API