Legal Opinion

Gart v. Cole

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 16, 1959No. 184, Docket 25358PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Chief Judge.

This is the fifth of a prolonged series of actions attacking the validity of the Lincoln Square Urban Renewal Project, a slum redevelopment project of the City of New York partially financed by federal funds under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1441 et seq. Appellants, property owners and residential and business tenants in the Project .area, instituted this action as individuals and on behalf of all others similarly situated just seven days after the Supreme Court denied certiorari in 64th Street Residences, Inc. v. City of New York, 4 N.Y.2d 268, 150…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Zorach v. ClausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Karl W. Hahn v. Joseph GottliebCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  3. Powelton Civic Home Owners Ass'n Ex Rel. Hilburn Harbidge v. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Law Students Civil Rights Research Council, Inc. v. WadmondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Wojchowski v. DainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API