Legal Opinion

Mearida v. Murphy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 19, 1982No. 17482PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trapp

Defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court which granted specific performance of an option to purchase a 28-foot easement across the land of defendants. Plaintiffs are third-party beneficiaries of the option.

In Mearida v. Murphy (1980), 87 Ill. App. 3d 87, 409 N.E.2d 145, this court reversed a summary judgment entered in favor of these defendants and remanded the cause for further proceedings. It was then held that the deed controlled a conflicting contract through the operation of merger and that plaintiffs, as third-party beneficiaries, had standing to enforce the option.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kilcoin v. OrtellIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Nelson v. Evangelical Hospital Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Powell v. PowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. McMillan v. IngoliaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Johnson v. GianacakosIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. Affiliated Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  2. Douglas Theater Corp. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Stender v. National Boulevard BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Walters v. SporerNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Manella v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API