Legal Opinion

General Teamsters Local 959 v. National Labor Review Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1984No. Nos. 83-7767, 83-7869PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The question on appeal is whether the union’s conduct fits within one of the judicially recognized exceptions to the ban against secondary boycotts. The NLRB found against the union and issued a cease and desist order. We affirm.

Facts

The Odom Corporation, a wholesale distributor of dry goods and beverages, operates two warehouses in Anchorage, Alaska under the name of Anchorage Cold Storage. Before the strike 85% of Anchorage Cold Storage’s inventory was shipped from “the lower 48” to Anchorage on ocean-going vessels. The company employed one worker full-time and three part-time to move goods…

2Cases cited10 opinions

National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Engineers, Chemists & Technicians, Local 231District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
National Labor Relations Board v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers Local Union No. 135Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, Local No. 433, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

General Teamsters Local 959, State of Alaska v. National Labor Review Board, National Labor Relations Board v. General Teamsters Local 959, State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984