Ktsanes v. Underwood
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PELL, Circuit Judge.
This action for injunctive and declaratory relief, invoking our jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), to enforce the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenges the constitutional validity of Rule 705(d) of the Supreme Court of Illinois. Rule 705 (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1975, ch. 110A, §. 705) provides that an attorney who has resided and practiced law in another state for five years may, upon passing a character and fitness test, be admitted to the bar of Illinois. Paragraph (d) of Rule 705 provides:
An applicant who has taken and failed to pass the bar examination…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Greyling Byron Poats v. Richard M. Givan, Chief JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- In Re BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Lowrie v. GoldenhershDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- United States ex rel. Hoover v. ElseaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.