Legal Opinion

Stroeder v. Office of Medical Assistance Programs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 19, 2001No. D4-3617-AK7110; A110956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of a final order on reconsideration of the Office of Medical Assistance Programs (OMAP), 1 in which OMAP denied her request, under the Oregon Health Plan, 2 for coverage for services related to a combined lung and liver transplant. We conclude that OMAP properly denied coverage under its administrative rules pertaining to transplants and that its decision did not violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 USC § 12101 et seg. Accordingly, we affirm.

We summarize the facts from the record and from OMAP’s final order on reconsideration. Claimant suffers…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Olmstead v. L.C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Vernon Crowder Stephanie Good v. Yukio Kitagawa, Chairman, Board of Agriculture, State of Hawaii Calvin LumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wai Po Leung v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API