Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Healy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 14, 1981PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

In Johnson v. Healy (I), 176 Conn. 97, 405 A.2d 54 (1978), this court decided that the plaintiff, Ronald K. Johnson, had established a cause of action for innocent misrepresentation against the defendant, John J. Healy. Because of error in the trial court’s calculation of the damages resulting from such misrepresentation, we remanded the case for further proceedings limited to the issue of damages. Upon the retrial, the plaintiff was awarded the sum of $2750 in accordance with the standard established in Johnson v. Healy (I), supra, 106, “the difference in value between the property had it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Johnson v. HealySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. Morgan v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  5. Levesque v. D & M BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API