Legal Opinion

Sarhanis v. Young

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 13, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The plaintiff, a boy of six, was run down by an automobile operated by the defendant. An auditor, appointed under Rule 88 of the Superior Court (1932), whose findings of fact were not to be final, found that the injury was caused by negligence of the defendant without contributory negligence of the plaintiff or of any one having charge of his person. Liability is conceded. The only question relates to damages.

*572Although the plaintiff reserved the right to present further evidence, the case was in fact submitted to the jury upon the auditor’s report without further evidence from either party. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maynard v. Royal Worcester Corset Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. C. W. Hunt Co. v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Savin v. BlockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vaught Construction Corp. v. Bertonazzi Buick Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Allison v. SessaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Connelly v. ScarpaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Leason v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Catalani v. AslanianMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API