Legal Opinion

Connelly v. Scarpa

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 2, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Exceptions overruled. That the jury awarded the plaintiff Catherine N. Connelly $12,000, notwithstanding the finding of the auditor (not final) that her damages were $15,000, did not require a new trial. Consistent with the rule stated in Cook v. Farm Serv. Stores, Inc. 301 Mass. 564, 566-567, such a . finding of damages, depending “upon sound judgment based largely upon common knowledge” (Sarhanis v. Young, 301 Mass. 571, 572), is not binding where a description of the injuries, warranting a finding in a different amount, is given in the auditor’s report, ibid., or in the testimony of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Savin v. BlockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Moran v. Pieroni, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Sarhanis v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LaMantea v. Cambridge Gas Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Catalani v. AslanianMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Dawson v. TrainorMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API