Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Indopco, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 2000No. WD 57149PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ULRICH, Judge.

Howard Simpson appeals from the trial court’s grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) in favor of Indopco, Inc., d/b/a National Starch and Chemical Company, Inc. (National Starch) on Mr. Simpson’s malicious prosecution claim. Mr. Simpson contends that National Starch failed to provide accurate, complete and potentially exculpatory information to the Fraud Unit of the Division of Workers’ Compensation, which caused criminal charges to be filed against Mr. Simpson. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Facts

Mr. Simpson is an employee of National Starch. He filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burnett v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Jungerman v. City of RaytownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Davis v. Board of Educ. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Faust v. Ryder Commercial Leasing & ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Crow v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan v. Community Health PlanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Clements v. Haskovec, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  4. Johnson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Ozark Employment Specialists, Inc. v. BeemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API