Legal Opinion

Clements v. Haskovec

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 17, 2008No. 13-04-063-CVPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice BENAVIDES.

In this case, we review the factual and legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting a now-expired family violence protective order. Although an expired order is ordinarily moot, this appeal is live under the “collateral consequences” exception to the mootness doctrine. See In re Cummings, 18 S.W.3d 472, 475 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2000, no pet.). We conclude that the evidence before the county court was legally and factually sufficient to support the protective order. Therefore, we affirm the judgment.

I. Background

The subject of the protective order in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Williams v. LaraTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Marshall v. Housing Authority of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Russell Thomas Boyd v. Christina Michelle Palmore, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  2. Garcia v. TAUTENHAHN, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  3. Ashleigh Elise Teel v. Kenneth Richard Shifflett, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  4. Carl Emanuel Lewis v. Bridney Yancy, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020
  5. Cesar Rene Terrazas v. Deborah Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API