Legal Opinion

United States v. Milko Mitov

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 21, 2006No. 05-2275PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Because of actions stemming from Milko Mitov’s mistaken belief that “everybody takes money in the United States,” a jury convicted him of attempted extortion under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. On appeal, he attacks the form of his indictment, evidentiary decisions made by the trial court, the sufficiency of the evidence leading to his conviction, and his sentence. We affirm.

I. Background

In late 2000, Jay Berlinsky was contacted by Steven Japp, an executive with a corporate client, the family-owned Jays Potato Chip Company, on a personal legal matter. Steven was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. Jose P. FlorescaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Antonino Cusimano and Philip DucatoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Robert R. Krilich, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. SilviousCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Michael P. HaldorsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Alex CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Clarence HendrixCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API