Legal Opinion
United States v. Antonino Cusimano and Philip Ducato
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 13, 1998No. 97-1186, 97-1187 and 97-2786PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Antonino Cusimano and Philip Dueato challenge their convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. Cusimano also challenges his conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Specifically, both Cusimano and Dueato argue that the district court constructively amended the indictment through its jury instructions. Dueato also argues that the prosecution denied him a fair trial by imper-missibly vouching for the credibility of cooperating witnesses in its closing argument and that the district court erred in denying his motion for a new…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Marvin BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Thomas S. Ross and John ColloriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Daniel J. LeichtnamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jose P. FlorescaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- United States v. Robert U. SymeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Abraham HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. George C. HookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James HerrimanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Calvin Trennell, A/K/A MeechieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.