Legal Opinion
United States v. Clarence Hendrix
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 9, 2007No. 05-3644PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted defendant Clarence Hendrix of one count of distributing at least fifty grams of crack cocaine. The conviction arose out of a drug transaction with a confidential informant. Hendrix appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, that he was entitled to a missing witness jury instruction after the confidential informant failed to testify, that the government improperly used the confidential informant, and that his sentence is unreasonable based on a disparity between sentences for powder and crack cocaine. We affirm…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. John J. Leahy, William E. Stratton, James M. Duff, and Terrence DolanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Taryll MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. John L. Tolliver and Archie Dunklin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Robert GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Robert MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. UseniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. PresbiteroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GaytanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.