Legal Opinion

United States v. Maggio

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 4, 1942No. 7819PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

The defendants, Anthony Maggio, Cari Ippolito, Gughelitno Ciccone and Bartholomew DiNola were convicted upon all five counts of an indictment which charged them with unlawfully engaging in the business of distillers, possessing an unregistered still, failing to give notice of the still, fermenting mash fit for distillation in a building not authorized as a distillery and conspiring to violate the internal revenue laws relating to stills. Each of the defendants contends that the government failed to prove its charge as to him and that the trial court, therefore, erred in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. Curtis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  2. United States v. August Edward Schartner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Kowalchuk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  4. United States v. AmorosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. United States v. MichenerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API