Legal Opinion
United States v. Amorosa
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 6, 1948No. 9431, 9434PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants were convicted at a joint trial but under separate indictments, of theft of freight in interstate commerce. 1
There was testimony in the case that as a result of a chance talk in a New York dance hall ' between Anthony and Steve Menna (brothers) and Edward Manupelli and Steve Montalbano concerning possible theft of merchandise from trucks “that lay over” in Jersey City, the Mennas contacted appellant Silano who said he could get them a tractor and that he would have to look around and make sure where he could get the tractor and “who he can get to pull the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Simon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Wilson M. Smith, Jr. v. United States of America, Raymond Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Jesse James Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- United States v. Alfred ManuszakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- State v. HatcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.