Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Ronwin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1996No. 20589 & 20691PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In this consolidated appeal, Edward Ron-win (Ronwin), Richard W. Maes and Carol Maes (collectively referred to as “Maes”) appeal from an adverse judgment by which a transfer of Ronwin’s interest in a partnership to the Maes was set aside as fraudulent; Ronwin appeals from a $25,000 judgment for punitive damages; and the Maes appeal from the dismissal of their counterclaims for slander of title and fraud. In this opinion, Ron-win and the Maes will sometimes be referred to collectively as “Appellants.”

The instant dispute had its genesis in a suit filed in Iowa by National Child Care, Inc. (a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Castorina v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Bentlage v. SpringgateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Conrad v. Diehl.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ed Peters Jewelry Co. v. C & J Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  2. Bowls v. ScarboroughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. In Re Smtc Mfg. of TexasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2009
  4. Schmidt v. WarnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Ulmanis v. UlmanisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API