Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Warner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1997No. 21228PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Judge.

This is a dispute between owners of land in Canterbury Lots, a subdivision in Camden County. The issues can be coherently addressed only after an account of the devilishly intricate facts.

Plaintiffs, Raymond A. Schmidt and Betty L. Schmidt, commenced this suit October 2, 1990, by filing a three-count petition against Robert S. Warner and Vera L. Warner. Plaintiffs’ petition and the Warners’ answer established that the Warners then owned all of Lot 10 and part of Lot 11 in Canterbury Lots.

The plat of Canterbury Lots shows Lot 10 is a rectangle, the long axis of which runs southwest…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Herbert v. HarlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. Prueliage v. De Seaton CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Hastings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Berger v. HuserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Giles v. Riverside Transport, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. General Electric Capital Corp. v. RauchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Capital One Bank v. HardinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Hager v. Syberg's WestportMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Sanders v. Hartville Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API