Timmons v. Coonley
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. J. P. Wood and Stanley A. Smith, Judges. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, J., pro tem.
This is an action of unlawful detainer after default in payment of rent and the service of a three days’ notice to pay rent or quit. Defendant takes this appeal, first, from an order entered January 19,1915, denying defendant’s motion to vacate the entry of her default and permit the filing of an answer; second, from the judgment entered against her January 22, 1915; third, from an order entered January 26, 1915, denying her motion for a default judgment against the plaintiff on her cross-complaint.
The appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion to vacate the default…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Knight v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Mallory v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Wall v. HealdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Gardner v. StareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Forni v. YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- Prothero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hughes v. De MundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Jeremy Fuel & Grain Co. v. Denver & R. G. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
- Pickerill v. StrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Lewis v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.