William L. Zink and Frances P. Zink v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
After Dr. William L. Zink and his wife, Frances P. Zink, plaintiffs-appellees, paid additional taxes and interest resulting from the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) disal-lowance of the deductions that they claimed for research and experimentation expenses in airplane components under section 174(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Zinks filed a refund suit in the district court against the defendant-appellant, the United States. The district court, ruling for the Zinks, held that they were not merely investors and that their activities in connection with the airplane components were…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Higgins v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Meadowbriar Home for Children, Inc. v. GunnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Angelo Fiataruolo, Angelo Veno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Kellogg (In Re West Texas Marketing Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Krause v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- Sharon D. Kantor, Robert E. Kantor v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.