Sharon D. Kantor, Robert E. Kantor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the question of whether research expenditures made by a partnership in order to develop a new technology were incurred in connection with its own trade or business, within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 174, where the partnership had contracted another firm to conduct the research and had granted that firm the opportunity to obtain for a nominal sum the exclusive right to market the technology. The Tax Court held they were not, and thus were not deductible as current expenses. We affirm this determination. The appellants also contend that the Tax Court lacked…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Higgins v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Howard S. Scar and Ethel M. Scar v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Snow v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Nike, Inc. v. Comercial Iberica de Exclusivas Deportivas, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Richard StadtmauerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Bourekis v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1998
- Harris v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Gerdau MacSteel, Inc. & Affiliated Subsidiaries v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.