Lancaster County v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice STEVENS.
We granted review to determine whether the Commonwealth Court applied the proper legal principles and level of deference in its appellate review of the decision of' the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (the Board or PLRB), which found Lancaster County (the County) engaged in unfair labor practices under Sections 1201(a)(1) and (3) of the Public Employe Relations Act (PERA),1 when-it terminated the employment of Adam Medina and Tommy Epps. For the reasons that follow, we conclude the Commonwealth Court erred in reversing the Board, and thus, we reverse the decision of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re Appeal of Cumberland Valley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Borough of Ellwood City v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth, Office of Administration v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Mars Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- St. Joseph's Hospital v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Borough of Emmaus v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Chester Upland School District v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- 700 Pharm. v. Bur of WC (State Workers' Ins. Fund)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
- 700 Pharm. v. Bur of WC (State Workers' Ins. Fund)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
- 700 Pharm. v. Bur of WC (State Workers' Ins. Fund)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.