Legal Opinion

Valento v. Swenson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 2003No. Nos. C8-02-1051, C9-02-1057Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant, a child support obligor, appeals child support modification determinations from two different counties. The mother of Swenson’s two oldest children initiated a proceeding in Washington County to increase support for those children. Swenson initiated a proceeding in Ramsey County to reduce support for his youngest child. This court consolidated the appeals. We reverse and remand the consolidated cases to Washington County.

FACTS

Appellant James Swenson is the father of four children. The oldest are the two Valento children, born in 1988 and 1989. Their mother is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Marriage of Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Mark v. MarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API