Legal Opinion

State v. Torres

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2011No. 28583PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Amended Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.1

We hold that where the State seeks to prosecute a defendant in a Hawai'i state court, and seeks to admit evidence obtained in another jurisdiction, the court must give due consideration to the Hawai'i Constitution and applicable ease law, as indicated herein, when assessing whether such evidence is admissible against the defendant. Both Respondent and Petitioner and Respondent/Defendant-Appellant Jenaro Torres (Petitioner) applied for writs of certiorari to review the January 7, 2010 judgment of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA)2 filed pursuant…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel RamirezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. State v. McKnight.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. Metcalfe.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. Walton.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. Curtis.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API