In Re Larkin
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding to review the State Bar Court’s recommendation that petitioner Daniel P. Larkin be disciplined following his misdemeanor convictions of having violated Penal Code section 245, subdivision (a)(1), assault with a deadly weapon, and Penal Code section 182, conspiracy to commit assault with a deadly weapon. (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6101, 6102; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 951(d).)
The review department by a vote of eight to five adopted the hearing panel’s findings of fact, “mitigation” and conclusions, and found that the facts and circumstances surrounding…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Rose v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Turton v. State Bar of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
- Gadda v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.