Legal Opinion

In Re Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1992No. S018109Published

1Opinion of the Court

1 Cal.4th 689 (1992)

822 P.2d 1317

4 Cal. Rptr.2d 170

In re WILLIE SAMUEL JOHNSON on Habeas Corpus.

Docket No. S018109.

Supreme Court of California.

January 30, 1992.

COUNSEL

Carlo Andreani, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner.

John K. Van de Kamp and Daniel E. Lungren, Attorneys General, Richard B. Iglehart, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Edward T. Fogel, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richard B. Cullather, Mark Alan Hart and Frederick C. Grab, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

OPINION

BAXTER, J.

We are asked to decide whether a criminal defendant's constitutional right…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API