Miller v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Gary E. Miller sued the City of Omaha (City), the City of Omaha Employees’ Retirement System (COERS), and the State of Nebraska to obtain disability pension benefits for himself and a purported class of participants without a reduction for workers’ compensation or Social Security. The trial court initially granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. On appeal, we reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for further proceedings, concluding that a material question of fact prevented summary judgment. See Miller v. City of Omaha, 253 Neb. 798, 573 N.W.2d 121 (1998). On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Woodard v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Miller v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Hawkes v. LewisNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Livingston v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Crosby v. LuehrsNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. EhlersNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Adam v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Governor's Policy Research Office v. KN EnergyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.