Legal Opinion
Atlanta-One, Inc. Kevin M. McCarthy Thom Blodgett v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1996No. 95-70360PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Memorandum disposition filed August 1, 1996, is redesignated as an authored Opinion by Stephen S. Trott, Circuit Judge.
OPINION
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
This is a petition for review of a Securities and Exchange Commission Decision holding that Petitioners Atlanta-One, Kevin McCarthy, and Thom Blodgett violated rules of fair practice by charging customers unfair commissions. Petitioners argue: 1) there is not substantial evidence to support the SEC’s finding that Atlanta-One charged excessive commissions; 2) that they were denied due process; 3) that the National Association of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Peter EICHLER and Basil Witt, Petitioners, v. the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Philip S. SIRIANNI, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by9 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kevin Michael McCarthy Thomas William BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Securities and Exchange Commission, Henry C. Yuen Elsie M. Leung, Intervenors-Appellants v. Gemstar-Tv Guide International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Brownson v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bear Lake Watch, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Securities and Exchange Commission, Henry C. Yuen Elsie M. Leung, Intervenors-Appellants v. Gemstar-Tv Guide International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.