Legal Opinion
Walker v. Lee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 11, 1934No. 7289PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court entered July 25, 1933, denying plaintiff’s motion to retax the costs after the cause was remanded to the district court by this court. The principal complaint of the appellant is as to items of expense, amounting to $542.55, for the taking of depositions in an interference proceeding in the Patent Office between appellant Walker and one Chase. The appellant claims that as these depositions were taken in an interference proceeding the costs of the taking thereof should not be allowed in the case at bar notwithstanding…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- The BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Wooster v. HandyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
- Costs in Civil CasesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1852
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kemart Corporation, a Corporation v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- McWilliams Dredging Co. v. Department of Highways of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Howard Farmer v. Arabian American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Vincennes Steel Corporation v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- A.B.C. Packard, Inc., a Corporation v. General Motors Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.