Steele v. Allen
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
The parties are coterminous landowners; plaintiff on the east, defendant on the west. The land in dispute is a strip running (approximately) north and south along the dividing line between two 40’s on tbe east and two on the west. More accurately described as to dimension, the strip in controversy is 26 feet wide at the north end and 133 feet wide at the south end. In the amended complaint the description is by-metes and bounds, natural objects and, distances, defining the land in controversy as above stated. Plaintiff’s muniment of title showed a conveyance of the N. E. % of the S. E. and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oliver v. OliverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Spragins v. FitcheardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Livingston v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mink v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Forrester v. McFrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Mintz v. MillicanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Atkins v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931