Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Parker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1993No. 835PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*397JOHNSON, Judge:

In this case, we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred in failing to suppress a tape seized by police from the automobile of Nathanial Parker. We conclude that the search and seizure violated Parker’s rights under Article 1, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution as well as under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. We, therefore, reverse the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial at which the Commonwealth will not be permitted to introduce the illegally seized evidence.

In the present ease, Officer Milligan and his partner stopped…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Abdul-SalaamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. PhinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. ViallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. SierraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API