Legal Opinion

Gasswint v. Clapper

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 8, 1955No. 9178PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGE, District Judge.

Action by Charles W. Gasswint and the three corporations in which he is interested, for treble damages under Section Four of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S. C.A. § 15.

Specifically, the complaint, after setting forth the history of the issuance of defendants’ patent rights, alleges that the defendants have engaged in a combination and conspiracy to monopolize and restrain the sale and distribution of tractor cabs through the use of certain monopolistic practices, cross-licensing of patent rights, price-fixing, threatening potential competitors with patent infringement suits, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mesa Computer Utilities, Inc. v. Western Union Computer Utilities, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  2. Rohm and Haas Co. v. Brotech Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
  3. USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  4. Leh v. General Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  5. Moore Co. of Sikeston v. Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API