Legal Opinion

Buffkin v. Strickland

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1984No. 0066PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

Appellant Strickland appeals from the order of the circuit court that adopted the recommendations of a master that Strickland pay to respondent Buffkin certain sums of money in this accounting action. We affirm as modified.

The issues on appeal deal with (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to establish a farming partnership, (2) the composition of the partnership, (3) whether the proceeds from an insurance policy constituted partnership assets, (4) what expenses should be charged to the partnership, and (5) the sum each partner is entitled to receive by way of an accounting.

In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. McAlister v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  3. Peay v. PeaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. Stephens v. StephensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. Wyman v. DAVISSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Halbersberg v. BerryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  3. COSTA AND SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. LongCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Beck v. ClarksonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Borg Warner Acceptance Corp. v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API