Halbersberg v. Berry
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
The central issue in this appeal is whether partnership relationships existed between Appellants, William and Cather ine Berry, and the Respondent, David Halbersberg. The Berrys appeal from a holding that partnership relationships existed and the Berrys should account to Halbersberg for profits and damages. We affirm as modified.
The Berrys own Fun Fashions, Inc., a sewing operation in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, which manufactures t-shirts and other beachwear clothing. Halbersberg is a wholesale distributor of beachwear and owns two retail beachwear establishments in the area.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Klutts Resort Realty, Inc. v. Down'Round Development Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Lollis v. LollisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- South Carolina Department of Social Services. v. BacotCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Baptist Foundation for Christian Education v. Baptist CollegeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Pitts v. Jackson National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Reliance Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Qzo, Inc. v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.