Legal Opinion

Halbersberg v. Berry

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 29, 1990No. 1508PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

The central issue in this appeal is whether partnership relationships existed between Appellants, William and Cather ine Berry, and the Respondent, David Halbersberg. The Berrys appeal from a holding that partnership relationships existed and the Berrys should account to Halbersberg for profits and damages. We affirm as modified.

The Berrys own Fun Fashions, Inc., a sewing operation in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, which manufactures t-shirts and other beachwear clothing. Halbersberg is a wholesale distributor of beachwear and owns two retail beachwear establishments in the area.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Klutts Resort Realty, Inc. v. Down'Round Development Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. Lollis v. LollisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. South Carolina Department of Social Services. v. BacotCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Baptist Foundation for Christian Education v. Baptist CollegeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Pitts v. Jackson National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Reliance Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Qzo, Inc. v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API