Legal Opinion

Borg Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Darby

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 9, 1988No. 1148PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is a breach of contract action. Borg Warner Acceptance Corporation commenced suit against Brad D. Darby, Donald L. Ross, L. L. Sweatman, and their Music Mart partnership seeking damages for breach of contract plus inter-, est, costs, and attorney fees. Ross and Sweatman answered the complaint, denying any indebtedness to Borg Warner. Darby failed to answer and was adjudged in default. Following a nonjury trial, Borg Warner received judgment against all the defendants. Sweatman appeals. We affirm.

In 1978, Ross and Darby formed a partnership, known as Music Mart, for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chadron Energy Corp. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Buffkin v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Blackwell v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Glidden Coatings & Resins v. SUITT CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Grego v. South Carolina National BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. KellyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Isaac v. Gene's Used CarsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Melissa Dixon v. Weekley Homes, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
  5. Santos v. Harris InvestmentCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API