Legal Opinion

Hurricane Steel Industries Co. v. Maurice Pincoffs Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 17, 1971No. 459PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUNKS, Chief Justice.

In January, 1967, Hurricane Steel Industries Co., hereinafter called “Hurricane,” ordered approximately 4,000 metric tons of steel wire rod from Maurice Pincoffs Company, hereinafter called “Pincoffs.” The sale was by sample so that an express warranty that the goods should conform to the sample was created. Sec. 2.313, U.C.C., V.T.C.A. The rod was used in the manufacture of woven wire fence. The purchase price was $4.85 per hundred weight.

Soon after Hurricane began processing the rod, on April 26, 1967, it complained to Pincoffs that the rod was “substandard” and gave…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Parts Co., Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Harry Rubin & Sons, Inc. v. Consolidated Pipe Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tri-State Petroleum Corporation v. Saber Energy, Inc. D/B/A Saber Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. Hinson-Barr, Inc. v. PINCKARD, IIISupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Albert Ortiz v. National City Home Loan Services, Inc. D/B/A First Franklin Loan Services, PNC, N.A., Harris County, (On Behalf of Itself and on Behalf of Harris County Department of Education, the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, the Harris County Flood Control District, and the Harris County Hospital District), Houston Independent School District, Houston Community College System, and Propel Financial Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2023
  4. Hinson-Barr, Inc. v. PINCKARD, IIISupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API