Legal Opinion
Hinson-Barr, Inc. v. PINCKARD, III
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 4, 1987No. 22717PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
*268This appeal is from an order granting respondent (Seller) summary judgment in its action for breach of contract against appellants (Buyer). We reverse and remand.
The following facts are undisputed. Buyer and Seller entered into a verbal agreement for the sale of certain restaurant equipment at which time they discussed an approximate price. An invoice was delivered with the equipment. Buyer, however, did not read the invoice when he accepted the goods and did not contest the invoice price until more than ninety days after delivery. Seller then commenced this suit to recover…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lorenz Supply Co. v. American Standard, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Azevedo v. MinisterNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Tom Jenkins Realty, Inc. v. HiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Hurricane Steel Industries Co. v. Maurice Pincoffs Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
3Cited by5 opinions
- Karl Sitte Plumbing Co. v. Darby Development Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Scott Ex Rel. Scott v. Greenville Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Advanced Mobilehome Systems of Tampa, Inc. v. Alumax Fabricated Products, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- ADV. MOBILEHOME SYS. v. AlumaxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Hinson-Barr, Inc. v. PINCKARD, IIISupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987