Legal Opinion
Stoll v. Adriansen
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided December 27, 1984No. 83-1673PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
William Stoll and Frances Stoll appeal from the trial court’s judgment granting Ronald Adriansen attorney fees and costs pursuant to the frivolous action statute, sec. 814.025, Stats. The Stolls also appeal the denial of their motion for similar relief under the same statute. We conclude that the trial court properly applied sec. 814.025 and affirm the judgment.
The Stolls and Adriansen entered into an oral agreement for construction of a residence in DePere, Wisconsin. Adriansen, a building contractor, began construction in 1972, and the Stolls moved into the house in April 1973.
In December…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- First National Leasing Corp. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- In Matter of Estate of BilsieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Kahn v. CundiffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Judith Nelson and Darci Anne Bowman, Cross-Appellees v. Monroe Regional Medical Center, Formerly Known as the Monroe Clinic, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Carl Munson v. Milwaukee Board of School Directors, Raymond E. Williams, Assistant Superintendent and Robert Long, Assistant SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Hanahan v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.