Legal Opinion

McDonough v. State Department of Workforce Development

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1999No. 97-3711-FTPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

¶1. John W. McDonough, D.O. (McDonough) requests review of a court of appeals' decision which held that an appeal of a necessity of treatment order must be served on the Department of Workforce Development (Department) and that service on the Labor and Industry Review Commission (Commission) was insufficient. The issue presented is whether McDonough, appealing a necessity of treatment order of the Department, can achieve service by serving the Commission rather than the Department with enough copies of the summons and complaint as there are defendants. We hold that, given the ambiguity…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Jungbluth v. Hometown, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Byers v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cruz v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ellsworth v. SchelbrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. HMO-W INC. v. SSM Health Care SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Ronald E. Belding, Jr. v. Deeanna L. DemoulinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Bosco v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. German v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API