Legal Opinion
Claim of Black v. Swetnick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 6, 1953PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal by the insurance carrier from a decision and award by the Workmen’s Compensation Board which awarded compensation to the claimant and directed that the workmen’s compensation insurance policy issued to the Brooklyn Heights Terrace Corporation be reformed so as to name Dr. Samuel Swetnick as the insured. Dr. Swetnick was the sole owner of the capital stock of the Brooklyn Heights Terrace Corporation. The corporation purchased a building *998in July, 1947, at No. 10 Montague Terrace, Brooklyn, which Dr. Swetnick intended to use as his office and as a sanitarium for the care of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, N.Y. Indemnity CoNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Claim of Lipshitz v. CharlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Claim of Haskell v. HitchcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moore v. Adams Electric CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Roads West, Inc. v. AustinCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Thompson v. Harold Thompson TruckingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
- Employers Insurance Co. of Alabama v. LewallenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Laura Accessories, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.