Claim of Haskell v. Hitchcock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.
Arthur M. Sweet owned a farm in Chautauqua county. In the fall of 1938 he decided to build a barn to replace one that had burned down some months before. He consulted with Harry Hitchcock, a carpenter and barn builder, and made an agreement with Hitchcock to build this barn by which Hitchcock agreed to do all the labor. Sweet agreed to pay Hitchcock $1,375 for this work, to furnish all the material and to carry the necessary workmen’s compensation insurance at bis own expense. Sweet was building a silo at the same time and he also wanted the men who worked on the silo covered for workmen’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. HellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, N.Y. Indemnity CoNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Claim of Lipshitz v. CharlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Claims of McMahon v. GretzulaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Claim of La Morticella v. La Morticella Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- Claim of Black v. SwetnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953