Legal Opinion

Claim of Haskell v. Hitchcock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.

Arthur M. Sweet owned a farm in Chautauqua county. In the fall of 1938 he decided to build a barn to replace one that had burned down some months before. He consulted with Harry Hitchcock, a carpenter and barn builder, and made an agreement with Hitchcock to build this barn by which Hitchcock agreed to do all the labor. Sweet agreed to pay Hitchcock $1,375 for this work, to furnish all the material and to carry the necessary workmen’s compensation insurance at bis own expense. Sweet was building a silo at the same time and he also wanted the men who worked on the silo covered for workmen’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. HellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, N.Y. Indemnity CoNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Claim of Lipshitz v. CharlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Claims of McMahon v. GretzulaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  5. Claim of La Morticella v. La Morticella Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Claim of Black v. SwetnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API