Legal Opinion
Zimbrick v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided April 18, 2000No. 99-1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. De Pere Foundry, Inc., and the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC or the commission) appeal a circuit court order holding that Gail Zimbrick did not receive adequate notice of a worker's compensation hearing. The court accepted Zimbrick's argument that the notice failed to explain her legal role at that hearing. We reverse the circuit court's order because Zimbrick failed to indicate how she was prejudiced by the inadequacy.
Background
¶ 2. Gail Zimbrick's husband, Clarence, was killed on September 3, 1997, in an industrial accident at De Pere Foundry, Inc. (Foundry). A sand mold…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Charles KELLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- L. G. Balfour Company, a Corporation, and Burr, Patterson & Auld Company, a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Abercrombie v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Hakes v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Homeward Bound Services, Inc. v. Office of the Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- Anderson v. Wis. Dep't of Fin. Insts.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019