Anderson v. Wis. Dep't of Fin. Insts.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtHagedorn, J.
¶1 The constitution limits the power of the state to take someone's property. At a minimum, constitutional due process requires the state to provide notice and an opportunity to be heard. This case concerns whether sufficient notice was provided when the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) notified Gregory A. Anderson that he was liable for more than three million dollars due to his alleged involvement in unlawful securities transactions.
¶2 In its notice, DFI informed Anderson that he had thirty days to "request a hearing" or its allegations would be deemed proven and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Estate of Wolff v. Town Board of WestonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Messner v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.