Legal Opinion

Scanlan v. Greenwich

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 14, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01322Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JANE DOE ) 3:18-CV-01322 (KAD) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) TOWN OF GREENWICH, et al., ) Defendants. ) July 14, 2020 ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF No. 185) Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is the Plaintiff’s motion to compel answers to certain questions posed to non-party deponent Peter Roe (“Roe”) during his deposition. Counsel for Roe instructed him not to answer certain questions on the basis that they were precluded by the protective order entered by this Court on September 11, 2019 or that the answers…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Gallegos v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Swidler & Berlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API