Cellutron Products Corp. v. Stewart
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cercone, J.,
The issue presented in this appeal is whether or not a defendant, after an appeal by him to the Common Pleas Court from an arbitrator’s award in plaintiff’s favor, can amend his counterclaim so as to change its basis.
The lower court did not permit the amendment, and we hold this to be error. Amendments are liberally allowed under Buie 1033 of the Pennsylvania Eules of Civil Procedure 1 and we see no reason to apply a more restrictive rule merely because the cause of action before the court has come to it upon appeal from a arbitrator’s award. Though it is true that…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- BELL v. ShetromSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Lanigan v. LEWISSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3Cited by16 opinions
- Standard Pipeline Coating Co. v. Solomon & Teslovich, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Tanner v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Sands v. ForrestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Pastore v. Anjo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Conner v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.