Conner v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
GRACI, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from the order entered on April 19, 2002, denying Appellant, Scott Conner’s, (hereinafter “Conner”) motion for award of counsel’s fees in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. Upon review, we affirm the order of the trial court.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 We adopt the following factual and procedural history as stated by the trial court:
[Conner] instituted this action through a complaint in arbitration based on his purchase of an allegedly defective used vehicle and [DaimlerChrysler’s] failure to correct the defects. Count I of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. BorosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Weber v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Everett Cash Mutual Insurance v. T.H.E. InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Dollar Bank v. SwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- O'Keefe v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Provenzano, D. v. Ohio Valley General Hosp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Joseph v. Advest, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Hairston v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- PennEnergy v. Winfield ResourcesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.