Legal Opinion
McHenry v. PacificSource Health Plans
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 5, 2009No. CV-08-562-STPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STEWART, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Lisa A. McHenry (“McHenry”), is a participant in the Metro Area Collection Service, Inc. (“Metro Area Collection”) Group Health/Dental Plan (“the Plan”), which is insured by defendant PacificSource Health Plan (“PacificSource”). She brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 USC §§ 1001-1461, to obtain coverage for Applied Behavioral Analysis (“ABA”) therapy received by her minor son, J.M., to treat his autism beginning January 2007.
This court has jurisdiction under…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McHenry v. PACIFICSOURCE HEALTH PLANSDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- Goldinger v. Datex-Ohmeda Cash Balance PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
- Roth v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010